Opinions
Away from left: Daniel Digashu, his spouse, Johann Potgieter in addition to their child, envisioned alongside Anita Seiler-Lilles and you will Anette Seiler. (Photographs thanks to Equivalent Namibia)
By BRADLEY FORTUIN And you will THABO BUTHELEZI | On the ibia influenced one to Namibia’s immigration legislation need certainly to admit exact same-sex ibia, setting aside the newest Highest Courtroom . So it case’s decision will notably perception LGBTIQ+ liberties and you may advocacy inside Namibia plus the region.
Background
In the , Daniel Digashu, a south African Resident and you can Johann Potgieter, a good Namibian resident, contacted the Large Court away from Namibia after the Ministry from Home Items and you will Immigration denied Digashu, a south African citizen, a work enable considering its same-sex marital status.
Furthermore, Namibian-created Anete Seiler and German-created Anita Seiler-Lilles contacted the brand new Highest Legal from Namibia once Anita was rejected long lasting household according to its marital position.
Brand new Large Court, composed of about three judges, dismissed seksi LehГ§e single its apps. The fresh new Large Court held that Structure from Namibia banned discrimination based on sexual positioning; however, this may not give new couples’ software because of a great 2001 judgement by Best Judge from Namibia from inside the Immigration Choice Panel v Frank, and therefore would not recognize the latest legal rights of exact same-sex partners underneath the Immigration Act.